In spite of the rumors Thursday afternoon which quoted sources who said the Washington Nationals were "aggressively shopping" John Lannan around the league in anticipation of agreeing on a deal with free agent right-hander Edwin Jackson, when the Nats' GM spoke to reporters Thursday night he said, "We're certainly always open to [making] a deal that makes sense for us, and if it can improve the ballclub, but we did not acquire Edwin Jackson to trade another starting pitcher." The GM did, however, say that the Nats would keep an open mind about making a deal if one arose. In Jackson and Gio Gonzalez, the Nationals have added two power arms to their rotation to pitch alongside Stephen Strasburg, Jordan Zimmermann and whichever one of the three starters between Chien-Ming Wang, John Lannan and Ross Detwiler earns a starting role coming out of Spring Training.
The deal with Jackson, Rizzo told reporters, (which is said to be for 1-year/$8-$12M) doesn't change the team's plans for John Lannan. When the GM was asked if the 27-year-old left-hander could conceivably be moved into a bullpen role like many expect Ross Detwiler will be, early this season at least, the general manager said no, "I think John, his strength is as a starting pitcher. I think that he's a quality starter that's given us quality innings in the past [and] I believe is going to give us quality innings in the future, and he's an asset to our team and like I said, gives us quality and also gives us depth and options."

Asked if Lannan had any remaining options, (Detwiler has no options remaining which could figure in the decision-making process this Spring), Rizzo reiterated that though Lannan does have an option, "We feel that he's a major league pitcher. He's major league caliber and he's major league-ready to help a contending team and we feel that he's a solid major league starting pitcher and that's what we're going to use him as."
In Gonzalez and Jackson, the Nationals have added two starters who've put up multiple 200.0+ inning seasons to what is a relatively young staff with question marks throughout. Gio Gonzalez has pitched 200.2 and 202.0 innings in each of the last two seasons, respectively, and Edwin Jackson's gone over 200.0 IP in two of the last three campaigns, missing the two-hundred inning mark by a third of an inning in 2011. Both pitchers have struggled with control at times though. Gonzalez has walked 4.44 BB/9 over 535.1 career innings pitched. Jackson walked 62 (2.79 BB/9) in 199.2 IP last season, but he's walked 3.66 BB/9 over 1079.0 IP in his career.
When Rizzo was asked about Gio Gonzalez's control issues in a conference call with reporters after the deal, the general manager said he wasn't worried about the left-hander's walk totals. "We really like his peripheral numbers," Rizzo told reporters, "He's won a lot of games on a mediocre club. 16 wins on the Oakland A's last year was quite a feat. He has the propensity to strike players out. He's got swing and miss stuff and we see his walks turning in the right direction. We see him having general command and we think as he progresses into his career, each and every year he's going to improve on his command."
The general manager said tonight that the Nationals believe there's room for improvement with their new 28-year-old right-hander as well. "We think [Jackson's] got a bit of upside left," Rizzo said, "He's a guy that we've seen a lot. I've scouted a lot personally when I was doing scouting for other clubs. We're going to make a few tweaks to his delivery. Last year he was a different pitcher out of the windup than he was from the stretch. We feel that there [are] certain tweaks we can make to his delivery that will make him more difficult to see. If you look at the splits with runners on base, pitching from the stretch, and runners not on base, pitching from the windup, the numbers are really surprising, with [a .339] BAA from the windup and much, much less from the stretch."
• Edwin Jackson's 2011 Splits:
| Split | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | HBP | SH | SF | IBB | ROE | tOPS+ | sOPS+ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| --- | 32 | 428 | 395 | 8 | 134 | 25 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 69 | 2.16 | .339 | .390 | .478 | .869 | 189 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | .396 | 126 | 146 |
| Men On | 32 | 433 | 381 | 81 | 91 | 23 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 1 | 30 | 79 | 2.63 | .239 | .292 | .373 | .665 | 142 | 27 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | .277 | 73 | 80 |
• Edwin Jackson's Career Splits:
| I | Split | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | HBP | SH | SF | IBB | ROE | tOPS+ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| --- | 201 | 2554 | 2297 | 64 | 664 | 118 | 18 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 244 | 424 | 1.74 | .289 | .361 | .440 | .800 | 1010 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | .332 | 107 | |
| Men On | 202 | 2158 | 1891 | 476 | 490 | 102 | 14 | 55 | 101 | 28 | 195 | 377 | 1.93 | .259 | .327 | .415 | .742 | 785 | 113 | 9 | 37 | 26 | 17 | 23 | .293 | 92 |
"We've got some ideas," the GM continued, "We've got some ideas that we've mentioned to Edwin and he's very receptive to them and pending him passing a physical, we'll introduce [the changes] to him and see if we can gradually implement them and see if it improves his command and deceptiveness. The stuff is there. The power is there. And again, a terrific character guy, make-up guy and another guy with a World Series ring and a guy that we feel really good about having on the club."
"You've seen his walks trending in the right direction," Rizzo said when asked about the control issues Jackson's dealt with in the past. "I think it's a more mature pitcher. Not afraid of pitching to contact. Attacking the strike zone especially early in counts. That's a mindset that we're going to pound into all of our starting pitchers this year again as we have in the past, but with his stuff, he needs to be comfortable and confident that he can get guys out and especially early in the count, not nibble and thus not walk as many guys and be more successful."
Is the acquisition of Jackson a sign that the Nationals are in "win-now mode"? "I've been in 'win-now mode' for my whole career," Rizzo joked, "We just didn't have the players capable of winning. We feel that we're a team that is going to be very, very competitive in a really difficult division. Our goal is to play meaningful games in September and beyond and we feel that the acquisition of this kind of talent allows us and gets us a step closer to doing that."
0 recs | 37 comments
stealth GM does it again
we heard about Buerhle and lost out
we hoped for Fielder and lost out
we never saw Gio, Lidge or Jackson coming, at least I didn’t
the under the radar signings seem to work out better for the Nats
gengreen17 - February 3, 2012
"we feel that the acquisition of this kind of talent allows us and gets us a step closer to doing that."
Hint, maybe, that Rizzo doesn’t think he is done yet for this offseason?
ricksnats - February 3, 2012
not til we get oswalt too
TJL - February 3, 2012
Fuhgettabout Oswalt
at least for this year. He signed with St. Louis.
Whupass - February 3, 2012
Are you sure?
I haven’t seen anything on this since the rumors last week. He was still an FA as of this morning.
RobBobS - February 3, 2012
Hm
I thought it was a done deal…
Whupass - February 3, 2012
Reported as such (shakes first at Twitter) not done...
Patrick Reddington - February 3, 2012
Rick: "I was misinformed."
Whupass - February 3, 2012
MarkZuckerman:
What Jackson does have over Lannan: He pitches deeper into games. Averages 6.34 innings per start, Lannan 5.87.
dc Roach - February 3, 2012
Well, that is one measure.
It’s not necessarily a GOOD measure…
RobBobS - February 3, 2012
It wasn't a good mesaure when Rigglean was managing...
But with competent managment it’s a pretty decent yard stick.
Dan Shields - February 3, 2012
No, it's not
It depends a lot on the team and, especially, the state of the bullpen. Just ‘cause Livo pitched 200 innings or so doesn’t mean he should have pitched 200 innings.
RobBobS - February 3, 2012
acomak:
Edwin Jackson passed his physical. He is officially a #Nationals pitcher. #Nats.
dc Roach - February 3, 2012
Viva RIZZO!!!
Love what Boras initially tried to get for EJ and what he eventually got. A rare whiff for Super A. (The A can stand for 2 different words.)
RoscoeNats - February 3, 2012
Aardvark and Angel?
I think this deal means Rizzo & Boras are up to something else. ZOW, was Rizzo in full marketing mode on Lannan! Too effusive for credibility.
I like the EJax signing, though. He and Gio almost almost get me over the loss of Livo. And, I know when they start winning games I’ll be happy.
BUT…….who’s going to THROW SLOWWWWWWER?
MissB - February 3, 2012 via mobile
Maybe Clipp and Storen need to develop a 59 mph curve ball...
…which we called the “gravity drop” back in Little League.
RoscoeNats - February 3, 2012
Hell 2 yrs ago CWS offered EJax in a straight-up swap for Dunn, and Rizzo turned thumbs down.
Now, with the advantage of 20/20 hindsight…
Whupass - February 3, 2012
Those were the reports anyway
I don’t ever believe “reports”.
RobBobS - February 3, 2012
I know, but this one is just too good to not be true
Whupass - February 3, 2012
And I like Espi better than Beckham anyway. Wasn’t that another piece the Nats were rumored to want…or was that just us discussing it?
RoscoeNats - February 3, 2012
He was the reason the trade didn't go through.
Their GM said it was too steep a price for a “rental.”
Horcasitas4 - February 3, 2012
I thought it was Kasten that killed that deal
gengreen17 - February 3, 2012
I like that version even better
Whupass - February 3, 2012
$11 million deal for Jackson
Jim_Duquette:
EJax deal with the #Nationals is valued at 11 mil., only 9 will be paid this year. He turned down 2 deals, betwn 20-25m over 3 years-
dc Roach - February 3, 2012
… I suppose pitching from the stretch 100% of the time would be too radical a notion …
jbg2772 - February 3, 2012
Hmm...maybe...
But I’d like to see a further breakdown of windup/stretch by lefty or righty batter. Because it would make sense to me that a good tweak might be “from the stretch all the time against righties, do windup/stretch as normal against lefties”
Jorgath - February 3, 2012
Why not? He wouldn't be the first.
Whupass - February 3, 2012
Paging the ghost of Don Larsen...
jbg2772 - February 4, 2012
Only WS perfect game ever
Yanks v Cards, 1956
Whupass - February 4, 2012
Hopefully
they tighten his wind-up. Less motion allows the ball to be hidden away. If your arm flails prior to release, the big leaguers see that. Ironically, I watched Strasburg’s first game lastnight and he showed the ball quite a bit, but he was just so fast it didn’t matter. Maybe hiding E-Jax’s will pay dividends. I’m so excited for this year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WizKid27 - February 3, 2012
I like what CM Wang does in his wind-up
He doesn’t just hide the ball – he stops, holding ball in glove over his head. Then, with the ball thus hidden, he eff’s with it for a good two-Mississippi before he comes down, kicks and deals. This has gotta mess with the hitter’s mind something fierce.
Whupass - February 3, 2012
Pity though that when runners get on
he gives up an OBP of .350 and a healthy SLG of .415 over his career.
RobBobS - February 3, 2012
how does that compare to league avg?
i bet all are worse with men on and, while that obp number is scary, is.415 slg really that bad?
William.Hatheway - February 3, 2012
All of them except Edwin Jackson, that is :-)
d_c_guy - February 3, 2012
Last year's NL split:
Men on: .332 OBP, .394 SLG
Bases Empty: .310 OBP, .394 SLG
RobBobS - February 3, 2012
NPUT...
All the Harper chatter that snuck into the EJax coverage…
Patrick Reddington - February 3, 2012
did you ask rizzo what the bp looks like if all of det, lan, and wang stay around?
William.Hatheway - February 3, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Federal Baseball to post a comment.