Greg Fiume - Getty Images
12 months ago: BALTIMORE, MD - MAY 20: General Manager Mike Rizzo of the Washington Nationals talks to the media before the game against the Baltimore Orioles at Oriole Park at Camden Yards on May 20, 2011 in Baltimore, Maryland. (Photo by Greg Fiume/Getty Images)
While the Washington Nationals wait patiently, publicly saying very little about anything other than how comfortable they are going with Adam LaRoche at first in the second year of his two-year/$16M dollar deal in 2012, a new report emerges every few days tying the Nats' to the top free agent bat left on the market. Are the Nationals interested in Prince Fielder? Did the 27-year-old slugger and his agent, Scott Boras, visit the Baltimore/Washington area on their recent tour of MLB cities? Did they meet with the Lerner family, the owners of the Nationals?
Will Boras steer another client to the nation's capital to join the likes of Jayson Werth, Stephen Strasburg, Bryce Harper, Anthony Rendon, Brian Goodwin, Alex Meyer and others in Washington's organization? Milwaukee Journal Sentinel writer Tom Haudricourt started the chatter today with a report entitled, "Nationals a favorite for Fielder", in which he wrote that an "MLB official" told him, "... that word is spreading in the industry that the Washington Nationals have emerged as a favorite to sign free-agent first baseman Prince Fielder." Mr. Haudricourt was hardly alone in reporting that the buzz around baseball has Washington interested...

FOXSports.com's Ken Rosenthal wrote tonight in an article entitled, "Money no issue as Nats pursue Fielder", that LaRoche's contract isn't going to get in the Nats' way, nor will concerns about the early returns on the first year of Jayson Werth's 7-year/$126 million dollar deal. The Lerners are the wealthiest owners in baseball, and they have increased revenue coming that could easily pay for Fielder. The Nationals want to win now, they've dealt with Boras before, and if they can get the best bat on the market they'll be a contender.
The bow-tied FOXSports.com reporter reaches the conclusion that a shorter deal with a high average annual salary would be best for both the Nationals and Fielder, or they could go with an opt-out clause in a longer deal which would enable him to become a free agent again in three or four years. "The only thing that might stop them is Lerner saying no to Boras," Mr. Rosenthal writes, "and we’ve yet to see that happen, have we?"
Washington Times' writer Amanda Comak wrote this afternoon that team sources told her a shorter deal is the only possibility, "... the party line remains the same: Unless the price -- specifically in years -- drops, the Nationals are unlikely to be that landing spot." NatsInsider.com's Mark Zuckerman wondered if the Nats were really about to become one of the big spenders in baseball and pointed out that the Nationals have consistently said they're not in the market for Fielder and only a select few people actually know the truth of the situation.
Washington Post writer Adam Kilgore examined a potential deal for Fielder in a Nationals Journal post entitled, "On Prince Fielder and the Nationals", and spoke to Scott Boras, who teasingly said his client could be described as, "... a combination of Henry Kissinger and Frank Howard,'" because, "Boras said. 'He’s got brute strength power. He’s a diplomat in the locker room.'"
Fielder's diplomatic skills feature prominently in his agent's pitch apparently. FOXSports.com's Ken Rosenthal quoted Scott Boras recently in an article entitled, "Boras taking his time with Fielder deal", explaining that the recent tour of potential destinations served the purpose of giving owners a chance to meet Fielder and see what he's all about. "'There is absolute surprise on the owners’ faces when he talks about leadership, his relationship with his teammates, his personal life,'" Boras told the FOXSports.com reporter, "'It’s just not at all what they expected to hear from a statured slugger.'"
Whether or not the Nationals' owners have heard Boras' pitch is still a mystery, with just one reporter, Baltimore Sun writer Dan Connolly, writing that a source told him the Washington/Baltimore area was on Fielder and Boras' itinerary during their recent travels around the country. Since they didn't meet with the Orioles' owner, they must have met with the Nats... right? The Nationals have neither confirmed or denied the reports, and why should they? If Fielder falls to them by, default, due to lack of interest elsewhere, on a deal they're all comfortable with, or if they've been quietly, aggressively pursuing him all along, they have first base covered by Adam LaRoche and even if he's not 100%, Michael Morse. They have options. Do Fielder and Boras?
0 recs | 35 comments
aas much as i would love him here, id mucg rather see zimm get a contract extension
hailyeah - January 2, 2012 via mobile
Can’t both happen? Doesn’t this increase the chances he’ll want to resign here (potentially for a discount)?
8vechkin - January 3, 2012 via mobile
Read Zuckerman's piece linked above
Zuckerman goes through how we’d have to have three players in the 20-25M range sooner rather than later and continues to shoot down Fielder rumors aggressively and with confidence. The talk of an opt out clause after a 3rd or 4th year though makes more sense to me, though, so who knows.
souldrummer - January 3, 2012
"three players in the 20-25M range"
So what? These aren’t your daddy’s Nats. They can afford that. Especially when you consider guys like Harper, Ramos, Desmond, Espinosa, Zimmermann, Strasburg, Storen, and Clippard aren’t going to be making anywhere near that amount of money for a long time.
And if they can’t afford that, then they might as well stop trying to compete, because the Phillies certainly can afford it. The Braves can, too. And, apparently, so can the Marlins.
RobBobS - January 3, 2012
Concur, actually ... IF they can do a five year deal
Or six or seven with an escape clause for Fielder and a reasonable buyout after five or six, then they can get out from under the Fielder contract (and shortly thereafter, the Werth contract) in time to start paying other big $$ contracts.
d_c_guy - January 3, 2012
Not saying that I wouldn’t like to see Fielder signed at the right price, but just because the Phillies and possibly the Braves and Marlins are anteing up right now doesn’t mean it won’t hurt them down the road
PerryMason - January 3, 2012
it said above that with fielder joining, zimm could leave
hailyeah - January 3, 2012
I took that line out because without reading the whole piece by Rosenthal it's misleading...
It was all speculative on his part.
Patrick Reddington - January 3, 2012
Hey Patrick, is the "bow-tied" reference to Rosenthal mandatory at this point? :-)
ricksnats - January 3, 2012
Yes and worth +5 pts.
Patrick Reddington - January 3, 2012 via mobile
+6
(+1 + +5)
ricksnats - January 3, 2012
Always! Never miss an opportunity to mock
The Bow Tied One who never met a baseless rumor he didn’t happily trumpet as truth.
MissB - January 3, 2012 via mobile
C'mon, Rosenthal wears the bow-ties for charity.
And really it’s just a way to amuse myself and avoid writing “FOXSports.com’s Mr. Rosenthal” 5 times per post. “The bow-tied FOXSports.com reporter” mixes it up…uh…I have no real reason.
Patrick Reddington - January 3, 2012
Charity...?
Thought Rosenthal wore it cause bow-ties are cool…?
Short term contract…? For a Boras client…? Unlikely….
BloggerVance - January 3, 2012 via mobile
Oh they are cool and cooler since they're for a cause...
Rosenthal’s arguing for the CC-esque mutual opt-out after 3-4 years.
Patrick Reddington - January 3, 2012
Bowties ARE cool, so are fezzes.
Doncosmic - January 3, 2012
Bunch of Who-lovers.
I avoided biting on his obvious attempt to get me to out myself as a Dr. Who fan. heh…
Patrick Reddington - January 3, 2012
Unless worn with a tuxedo, I’m trying to think of something less cool than a bowtie.
(Pee Wee Herman’s being the exception that proves the rule.)
PerryMason - January 3, 2012
ohhh ok. zim's contract makes him a free agent after 2013 right?
i couldnt remember
hailyeah - January 3, 2012
In other words, another day of fumes & vapors...
Blah, blah, blah FIELDER?
Blah, blah, FIELDER!
Really, Fielder? BLAH, BLAH, BLAHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhh.
(Something about idle hands/devil’s workshop.)
I keed; I keed, Patrick. You keep putting up this gi-normous target. What am I supposed to do with it?
Heh.
MissB - January 3, 2012 via mobile
Any idea what the record # votes for a FBb featured poll is?
Fielder and maybe Stras Debut Guess’em must be up there
TJL - January 3, 2012
Strasburg signing deadline poll from '09 is still the all-time winner in votes cast...(1607 votes)
Second highest is a Nov ’09 poll asking for 2009 NL Cy Young. (619 votes)
Patrick Reddington - January 3, 2012
The Prince and the 3rd Base Stopper (bad pun, sorry)
First, Happy New Year to all. May 2012 bring health and good fortune to all, both on and off the diamond.
Fielder is significantly better than any of the 1B FA’s for next year. That being said, I want the guy to sign anywhere, and soon. If the Nats can get him for a couple of years at a high per-season rate, great. If Boras is going to allow a deal like that to happen it might as well be to the Nats. Also, I personally believe that Werth is best used as a complimentary player, lineup featuring more firepower only serves to lower the expectations on him (and presumably allows him to find his comfort zone – a la his time in Philly).
Truthfully, there are extremely few truly elite third basemen in the Majors right now. The Nats have one of them. While a crowded lineup card maybe a headache, it’s a good headache to have (remember, it wasn’t too long ago that your RFK/Nat’s Park lineup looked like a bad AAA team). Rendon may become a great infielder, but right now, Zim IS a premier player. Draw up a contract and get it done.
DC_Dodger - January 3, 2012
Another day has dawned,
And more unsubstantiated Prince Fielder rumors have dawned with it. Someone wake me when he actually signs somewhere.
Pig.Pen - January 3, 2012
Interesting
I am torn.
I still think that you can still take a Rays approach and be a playoff contender without Fielder. Defense is an important facet, and I think Fielder hurts their defense beyond first base.
We also make the assumption that Werth can fill in at CF if we sign Fielder and have to keep Morse in the OF. However, this assumption includes Harper in the OF. I doubt he gets called up (at the earliest in July perhaps) which means that Werth can stay in RF and Cameron/Bernie split time in CF.
The problem with that is we then have to have Werth in CF for 2013 and beyond for when Harper does come up. He’ll be an incredibly old CF. If Hunter can’t do it, its a safe bet to assume Werth isn’t our CF solution in the slightest.
And sure, trading Morse makes sense. He is just SO cheap, I’d hate to make that move.
And thinking along that line. Maybe it makes sense to get another year of Morse then trade him once Harper comes up because Morse will be 31 or 32 and will be facing an eventual decline. I am glad I am not Rizzo.
Bsullivan - January 3, 2012
I am sure
Someone could make a basic analysis with Morse and Werth in the corners, Crisp at CF, and Laroche at 1st vs. some set up with Fielder at first and Werth in CF. How many wins difference is it? I know we can readily see Fielders 5+ WAR. But how many WAR do we lose with Werth in CF etc.?
Bsullivan - January 3, 2012
That would be tough to do
For the simple reason that there just isn’t enough data out there of Werth playing CF. However, 32+ year old CF’s have not fared well. My best guess is that Werth would be anywhere from a neutral WAR CF to a -3.0 WAR CF, which is a big gap.
Pig.Pen - January 3, 2012
So with that said
Over the next two years or so. It will be interesting to see what Rendon forces the Nats to do. It will also be interesting to see what they decide to do with Mike Morse. Is Morse at peak value now?
Bsullivan - January 3, 2012
They have him "cheap"
until he becomes a free agent in 2014.
Bsullivan - January 3, 2012
Yeah, I think it's peak value
He’s at an age where he should regress next year, but he’s under team control for 3 more years. If they’re going to deal him, now would be the time, but to me that’s how low-budget teams think and the Nats shouldn’t continue to be a low budget team. You take what you can get from Morse and when it’s time for him to hit FA, you make a decision.
Pig.Pen - January 3, 2012
The fix for Rendon seems easy...
Move him to 2B and if he forces their hand you pick between Espi and Desmond to play SS, most likely it’ll be Espi.
Pig.Pen - January 3, 2012
Yep, agreed
but trading players is never really easy. Rizzo also seems to be rather slow in his decision making.
Bsullivan - January 3, 2012
This also supports my interest in seeing the MiLB more than the MLB team this year
While I know the Nats are on the cusp of being a serious contender, the future of Meyers, Rendon, Purke etc. certainly make this team far more interesting. If we they show immediate talent it’ll be an exciting storyline.
I’d love to see Rendon really force their hand.
Bsullivan - January 3, 2012
With Desmond's arm and range he could be a hell of a utility guy.
I was opposed to experimenting with him in the outfield when it was Guzman threatening his position, but if it is Espinosa and Rendon? Desmond could be an above average fielder with a decent bat at several positions.
Doncosmic - January 3, 2012
Suuuure
But if he is worth more as a starter you trade him to a team to obtain a starter for the Nats. No sense in keeping him as a utility player. Sure, it would be a nice, but they could use him to get a CF for example.
Bsullivan - January 3, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Federal Baseball to post a comment.