Over a few hours last night, the story of Prince Fielder's meeting with members of the Texas Rangers brass broke and changed until the American League's defending champs were right back where they started. USA Today writer Bob Nightengale broke the news that the 27-year-old, 5'11'', 275lb left-handed power bat was in the Lone Star state, writing on Twitter that "The Texas #Rangers are meeting today with Prince Fielder at Dallas-area hotel."
CBSSports.com's Jon Heyman (@JonHeymanCBS) soon followed up with a report that the visit was part of another tour of interested teams like the one the Milwaukee Brewers' '02 1st Round pick and his agent Scott Boras took earlier this winter. Before this afternoon, everyone had assumed that the Rangers would only get involved in the pursuit of the PF Flyer if their negotiations with 25-year-old Nippon Ham Fighters' right-hander Yu Darvish broke down...

Fort Worth Star-Telegram writer Jeff Wilson wrote Friday night in an article entitled, "Rangers test water by talking to Prince Fielder", that, "A source confirmed the meeting at the Four Seasons Resort in Las Colinas, but no one seemed to definitively know the Rangers' intentions." The same source told the writer that as rumors had it, "Fielder is the Rangers' backup plan if an agreement can't be reached with Darvish." As the story of Fielder's visit evolved, ESPNDallas.com's Richard Durrett took a "Can the Nationals sign Fielder and extend Ryan Zimmerman?"-esque look at what a deal with Prince would mean for future talks with Rangers' center fielder Josh Hamilton.
Dallas Morning News' writer Evan Grant examined how Texas could afford to sign both Fielder and their outfielder in an article entitled, "Deadlocked slugger Prince Fielder is enticing to Rangers", and the proposed deals Mr. Grant came up with were posted in another article today entitled, "How the Rangers could ink Josh Hamilton and Prince Fielder to long-term deals." The Dallas Morning News' writer suggested an 8-year deal for Fielder with 6-years guaranteed and a player opt-out after four years and a team opt-out after five. You can read the details HERE.
As ESPNDallas.com's Mr. Durrett notes, an eight-year deal structured in a way that allows for flexibility on each end or the sort of deal that ESPN.com's Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) described last night on Twitter, ("One exec today believes WAS, TEX, CHC may ultimately get this Fielder contract structure: 6 years, opt-out after 3 years, 22-24m a year," Mr. Olney wrote) might cause some teams that thought they couldn't afford Scott Boras' asking price to revisit the discussions.
Seattle Times' writer Larry Stone, who broke the Michael Pineda/Jesus Montero, Mariners/Yankees deal last night that wiped "Fielder meets with Texas" off the front page, wrote in an article entitled, "Mariners to acquire catcher Montero for pitcher Pineda", that Seattle's deal with New York came out of nowhere while everyone was wondering if the M's were in on Prince. As Mr. Stone notes, though, "It is not known what the ramifications of this deal will be for Seattle's pursuit of Fielder. But they didn't add any payroll," in the trade so if they had the money beforehand, acquiring Jesus Montero's bat won't necessarily preclude the signing of the free agent slugger.
There was no word out of Washington last night. MASNSports.com's Roch Kubatko wrote, in an article entitled, "Fielder not slated to visit Charm City", that Boras and Fielder were not, "... scheduled to meet with Orioles officials. At least not yet." No word on whether or not another trip to the nation's capital is on the itinerary. Fort Worth Star-Telegram writer Jeff Wilson wrote Friday night that, "though the only other suitors are Washington and Seattle with six weeks remaining until spring training, Boras hasn't come off his asking price."
As MLB.com's Bill Ladson wrote Friday night, his sources too said, "Fielder's price must come down in order for the [Nationals] to consider acquiring his services." Washington Post writer Adam Kilgore's sources confirmed a second meeting between the Nationals' brass and Boras on Thursday night, so it appears Washington's still in the mix until we're told otherwise...You can't kill the Fielder to the Nats rumors. Don't even try.
0 recs | 33 comments
Fielder still not signed?
won’t someone think of the Sportzxperts!!!
cat daddy3000 - January 14, 2012
I believe the sportzxpertz are the future
The Herndon Kid - January 14, 2012 via mobile
and what kind of Fielder-less world will they be forced to inhabit?
cat daddy3000 - January 14, 2012
slo mo sto ren
pitching247:
Drew Storen pitching mechanics in slow motion 1000 FPS a sneak peak of the new pitchers power drive videos. A… fb.me/1DQqcrysD
dc Roach - January 14, 2012
the stiff left leg is classic...........glad they didn't talk him out of doing it...
cat daddy3000 - January 14, 2012
I get that it has some uniqueness to it,
but its an ugly delivery in my opinion. Reminds of the kid in little league who looked different to be “cool”.
Bsullivan - January 14, 2012
It's different
but it’s nowhere near “ugly”, IMO.
RobBobS - January 14, 2012
an .........eccentric delivery, but it works. Wish they had Peaches in slo-mo..
cat daddy3000 - January 15, 2012
Prince could always go to Japan, like his papa did
The Japanese seem to adore fathletes.
Whupass - January 14, 2012
Reminds me of when Boras tried the...
…“Strasburg could end up in Japan,” approach in his draft year.
http://mobile.dcist.com/2009/07/could_stephen_strasburg_choose_japa.php
Patrick Reddington - January 14, 2012 via mobile
Lombo interview
Nationals:
#Nats prospect Steve Lombardozzi reflects on making it to the Majors at the Rookie Career Development Program … atmlb.com/yhI4QP
dc Roach - January 14, 2012
Still interested to see where he starts the year.
Patrick Reddington - January 14, 2012
I imagine it depends largely on any future bench signings
dc Roach - January 14, 2012
I'd like to see him compete for a "super utility" spot.
If he excelled there, he could replace Desmond if he falters. We’d need to sign a utility infielder to a minor league contract in case Lombardozzi isn’t ready yet, though.
mstomper - January 14, 2012
Syracuse
…where he might’s well start shopping for a house
Whupass - January 14, 2012
I'll Jump On The Utility Bandwagon
I can’t see him being any worse than any other FA brought in to do the same job, and it gives the Nats an opportunity to see what he can contribute.
sullyzz - January 14, 2012
He's had enough in the Minors
Bring him up. They need a utility infielder. Let’s see what he can do. I like this young man a lot and think he will be a solid every day player in the future. In fact, I think he may be the leadoff hitter the Nats are looking for.
JamesFan - January 14, 2012
Good glove, no hit
Short story, but an old one.
Whupass - January 14, 2012
It's WAY too early to hang that tag on Lombardozzi
His minor league numbers are quite respectable. Even in his cup of coffee in September he wasn’t terrible – particularly once he finally got his first hit.
d_c_guy - January 14, 2012 via mobile
his minor league numbers were respectable, but still worse than Bixler's
Doncosmic - January 15, 2012
Maybe he will be the new Bixler.
Perhaps a new word for the lexicon is just around the corner – A Lombardoozy
PerryMason - January 15, 2012
Actually, I profoundly disagree with that
Two important things to remember: Bixler was a 28yo ballplayer playing in AAA for his fifth year; Lombardozzi was a 22 yo ballplayer. At the age of 22 Bixler hadn’t even made it to high A yet!
Even putting that aside, Lombardozzi’s career numbers are better. Bixler didn’t get his AAA average above .280 until 2010 (as a 27yo in his fourth year at AAA) when he hit .285. He didn’t get his average above .300 at AAA until 2011. Lombardozzi hit .310 his first year in AAA. And it’s no fluke; Lombo has hit below .285 once, as a 19yo in the GCL – and he hit .283 there. It took Bixler years to hit at AAA, but Lombardozzi hit .310 at AAA in his first go.
Bixler did have a better year at AAA (.314/.439/.407) than Lombardozzi did (.310/.354/.408) this year. But Bixler produced numbers better than anything he had done before in several years at AAA, did it in a fairly small sample size (25 games, 108 PA), and most importantly did it as a player who is pretty much as all he’s ever going to be. Lombardozzi put up comparable numbers, building on his work at AA and lower leagues, all while still learning the professional game.
I’m not sold on Lombardozzi as a prospect; he has little power (but decent speed – Lombardozzi stole 30 bases last year; Bixler has never stolen 30 bases in a season) and his OBP has dropped slightly as he’s moved up the ladder (.375 at A, .368 at AA, .354 at AAA). But he is at an age where he has growth potential. And he’s clearly better than Bixler (sorry, RoboBix!).
d_c_guy - January 15, 2012
ScreechTheEagle:
Over football already, let’s go #nats!
dc Roach - January 14, 2012
p&c in 35 and a wake-up
Whupass - January 14, 2012
In Football.....
I hear Screech is an Alabama Crimson Tide fan!
sullyzz - January 14, 2012
Were still in it
according to Ladson were talking to Prince camp about a contract of 6-7 years with a no trade clause approved by Mr.Lerner..of the no trade clause..heck ya..sry Texas keep on dreamin babyy
Sportzxpert - January 14, 2012 via Android app
Beware the Ladson report
His record is not spectacularly good
d_c_guy - January 14, 2012
He had cleverly set himself up though
At least one his reports filed this week will prove out, since he’s basically talking out of both sides.
RobBobS - January 15, 2012 via mobile
+1
You’ve just nailed Ladson’s best talent as a reporter.
BinM - January 15, 2012
Not necessaryily… If you read between the lines, what he may be saying is
But there is only a 1% chance that they will actually do this
PerryMason - January 15, 2012
There can be..........
no clause in those last years…………
artistfork - January 16, 2012
Good luck with that
Boras insists on that in all his clients’ contracts. Despite his remaining unsigned, I think Fielder has the “weight” to get a full no-trade clause.
jbg2772 - January 16, 2012
I would happily see the Nats give on the no trade clause
If they could shorten the length of the deal.
d_c_guy - January 16, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Federal Baseball to post a comment.